{"id":"W1892450565","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2015-0006","title":"Quantification and comparison of individual space-use strategies in foraging drift-feeding fish using fine-scale, multidimensional movement analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Context (archaeology); Salmo; Spatial ecology; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Brown trout; Temporal scales; Horizontal plane; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Cartography; Geodesy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000290792,0.0002934688,0.0002350103,0.00246052,0.0001909484,0.0003495477,0.0001644906,0.0002277708,0.0006212862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006332591,0.0001333312,0.0003787709,0.001236255,0.0002375247,0.0003361451,0.0003803953,0.0001027891,0.0001228966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000301754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002682104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00821369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01608129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999868,0.00002315117,0.0000125226,0.00005225617,0.00002792791,0.00001609188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997479,0.00007792982,0.00007851062,0.00002530983,0.00004534807,0.00002482382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000294911,0.0001642543,0.6435208,0.0003618585,0.0003555681,0.0001217929,0.001320049,0.03827116,0.1731418,0.0008351018,0.0004602567,0.1411525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005628197,0.0001099162,0.8962963,0.00001560369,0.00004440734,0.00009735894,0.0003847771,0.09694704,0.005458973,0.0002294338,0.0003706819,0.00003993214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808573,0.00009210855,0.01821818,0.000007845662,0.000002207364,0.00002455252,0.0003884488,0.00004476341,0.0003645464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613253,0.00009731839,0.03758105,0.000004947154,0.000002665523,0.00007136879,0.0005634046,0.00001316037,0.0003407956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00821369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01633179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06092339525874397,"score_gpt":0.273667095272247,"score_spread":0.212743700013503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}