{"id":"W1892917924","doi":"10.20360/g2t019","title":"Reading the World in the Word: The Possibilities for Literacy Instruction Framed Within Human Rights Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Literacy","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Critical literacy; Human rights; Literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Critical ethnography; Human rights education; Ethnography; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769277,0.0005470464,0.0007115357,0.001694658,0.01298958,0.01016869,0.001409619,0.002070571,0.002899574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007012546,0.0005771467,0.0004647454,0.0009600221,0.04222717,0.0111448,0.01035669,0.005886248,0.0001931951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003431587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002616624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003900801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009846667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911205,0.006945484,0.00009585988,0.0003484343,0.000351017,0.001138778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939604,0.004661871,0.0004143784,0.0002764368,0.0001371724,0.0005497528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001408167,0.00001937755,0.0008867187,0.00001717814,0.000001171326,0.0003322081,0.9904193,0.00001166035,0.0002877038,0.006338906,0.0001042438,0.00156747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004667392,0.00003233552,0.0006952159,0.00006653562,0.000002879437,0.0002193431,0.9883665,0.0000298266,0.0002719896,0.001959909,0.008343323,0.000007420217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661934,0.0006122577,0.002845433,0.003214591,0.00008109699,0.00006881457,0.00002126943,0.00001972146,0.02694344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969189,0.0002102167,0.0005859845,0.0002512154,0.00002172398,0.00003999193,0.000007672953,0.00001704233,0.001947211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01298958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03051126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01108596486932651,"score_gpt":0.3503555296545779,"score_spread":0.3392695647852514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}