{"id":"W1893160325","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2013-0159","title":"The Rock Physical Property Database of British Columbia, and the distinct petrophysical signature of the Chilcotin basalts<sup>,</sup>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lithology; Geology; Basalt; Petrophysics; Magnetic susceptibility; Rock magnetism; Magnetic survey; Magnetic mineralogy; Remanence; Mineralogy; Magnetite; Geochemistry; Magnetic anomaly; Geophysics; Magnetization; Porosity; Paleontology; Magnetic field; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004700166,0.0008938058,0.0006308167,0.007711364,0.001317189,0.002132703,0.001358516,0.0004602359,0.02908985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002992071,0.0003996057,0.000255849,0.01815559,0.0005502535,0.0007497518,0.0008396832,0.0005190221,0.01562478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007537561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9294204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9738776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990728,0.00003099342,0.0001071004,0.0001306558,0.0005327738,0.0001256863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939495,0.0003617606,0.0005146001,0.0005998404,0.004223618,0.0003506421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003724727,0.00009342773,0.1752926,0.001933004,0.0001601185,0.000924082,0.0004622495,0.002851489,0.007382821,0.00360305,0.5154038,0.291521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002933076,0.00001969185,0.4337825,0.000277793,0.00007295766,0.0003041875,0.0006869804,0.002467744,0.002709384,0.0008637921,0.5586998,0.00008574252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0334319,0.001757069,0.002854553,0.0004895754,0.00006195246,0.0001757867,0.9123296,0.001653212,0.04724631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077525,0.001603295,0.007365535,0.0001734722,0.00002234247,0.0001920507,0.8871359,0.0002698742,0.02571254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07057965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1419905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008132775907864544,"score_gpt":0.1906666262550096,"score_spread":0.1825338503471451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}