{"id":"W1893160325","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2013-0159","title":"The Rock Physical Property Database of British Columbia, and the distinct petrophysical signature of the Chilcotin basalts<sup>,</sup>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lithology; Geology; Basalt; Petrophysics; Magnetic susceptibility; Rock magnetism; Magnetic survey; Magnetic mineralogy; Remanence; Mineralogy; Magnetite; Geochemistry; Magnetic anomaly; Geophysics; Magnetization; Porosity; Paleontology; Magnetic field; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418777,0.00009465976,0.0003090232,0.00002903966,0.0007614372,0.0002310137,0.0008887299,0.00003435049,0.00008106781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001216317,0.00004383397,0.0001611583,0.0006556973,0.001995776,0.0001765483,0.00002395006,0.0004182183,0.000003287442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001045088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004757826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1133921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3546827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980341,0.0005734523,0.0003165952,0.0001799674,0.0005177096,0.0003782239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977958,0.001249329,0.0002798201,0.0001894055,0.0001448603,0.0003407763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001779363,0.0001203091,0.4185373,0.0001041867,0.0001151852,0.00002815658,0.001291381,0.0107963,0.0002165286,0.001607837,0.005215271,0.5617896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004311836,0.000572402,0.9368177,0.00009637978,0.00004011349,0.0000617389,0.0002013381,0.05068127,0.00006671307,0.005636424,0.005278281,0.0001164394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962445,0.0006098491,0.00004558911,0.00175471,0.0001719736,0.0001430601,0.00009212468,0.000001736717,0.0009363908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989131,0.00001835967,0.0001921051,0.0001837573,0.0002775446,3.756839e-7,0.000001040582,0.000002057763,0.0004116723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.892512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008132775907864544,"score_gpt":0.1906666262550096,"score_spread":0.1825338503471451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}