{"id":"W1893950709","doi":"10.1109/robot.1991.131784","title":"Qualitative analysis of task kinematics for compliant motion planning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Task (project management); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Motion (physics); Process (computing); Robot kinematics; Robot; Artificial intelligence; Basis (linear algebra); Qualitative analysis; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Geometry; Qualitative research; Mobile robot; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001080394,0.0006011105,0.0003682265,0.0008732862,0.0008256012,0.00183333,0.001123404,0.0005458713,0.007590491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003582835,0.0004128416,0.0009220036,0.0007001998,0.002055851,0.001817953,0.001253741,0.0009884367,0.001118999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001927008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001958288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005716416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003396199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993113,0.0001925918,0.00002970969,0.00006184931,0.0003477022,0.00005683649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990516,0.0004848054,0.00009775646,0.0001215397,0.0002058052,0.00003839357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002664189,0.0000157166,0.0001794875,0.0001110748,0.0000116141,0.0001004749,0.0002077759,0.19462,0.003361876,0.7800184,0.001198403,0.02014835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009355731,0.00001578235,0.0001151211,0.00005620831,0.00001252611,0.00003962616,0.00007715476,0.5080217,0.002067876,0.4808752,0.008693659,0.0000158144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001367151,0.00007306449,0.9944214,0.00008065065,0.00001342805,0.00002479114,0.00006160703,0.0001414154,0.003816388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3781376,0.0007925922,0.6096183,0.0001430848,0.0000563638,0.0006636397,0.0005971029,0.0002819132,0.009709371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007590491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02539277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07577734574895195,"score_gpt":0.3314239729670631,"score_spread":0.2556466272181111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}