{"id":"W1893950709","doi":"10.1109/robot.1991.131784","title":"Qualitative analysis of task kinematics for compliant motion planning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Task (project management); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Motion (physics); Process (computing); Robot kinematics; Robot; Artificial intelligence; Basis (linear algebra); Qualitative analysis; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Geometry; Qualitative research; Mobile robot; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009757867,0.00005902628,0.000190563,0.000117579,0.00001579863,0.000006269495,0.00004142456,0.00002884157,0.0001213035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001994419,0.0000523188,0.00007602562,0.0002269146,0.000006484826,0.00002880655,0.000004737579,0.00002360595,0.000003448404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001242994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.175252e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003755555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003062764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995826,0.000008031688,0.0001968454,0.00005753023,0.00006908463,0.00008591162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999707,0.00011292,0.00003037428,0.00009405849,0.00003204851,0.00002364289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[6.223615e-7,0.00001158202,0.00000873035,0.00005787535,0.0002555965,1.835909e-7,0.003413298,0.9647188,0.0005938771,0.03033494,0.0002424358,0.0003620583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009294826,0.00001825456,0.00008244411,0.000009521997,0.0001963336,1.597295e-7,0.001416471,0.9965606,0.00009881766,0.001455102,0.000008260089,0.00006104582],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007693307,0.00002786815,0.9893562,0.00001634992,0.00004930434,0.00008178948,0.00002174154,0.00005496384,0.002698492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5844936,0.000004344372,0.415226,0.00001215359,0.000008443465,0.000007133176,0.00002951546,0.000009820376,0.0002090176],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5768003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2133499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07577734574895195,"score_gpt":0.3314239729670631,"score_spread":0.2556466272181111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}