{"id":"W1894399504","doi":"10.1109/pes.2004.1372862","title":"Compensation of the voltage flicker using an efficient algorithm for series and parallel mitigating devices","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","topic":"Power Quality and Harmonics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flicker; Computer science; Voltage; Compensation (psychology); SIGNAL (programming language); Series (stratigraphy); Control theory (sociology); Algorithm; Voltage compensation; Electronic engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144532,0.0006875255,0.0005057043,0.0005512094,0.0003735144,0.0004369288,0.0006673209,0.0004823904,0.001880801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001027097,0.0002381661,0.0002873572,0.0004299874,0.0002992061,0.0006437242,0.0003003663,0.0006498756,0.0005554868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000280742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004962859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001109646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997941,0.00002715081,0.00001759615,0.00005715002,0.00008410056,0.00001986749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997109,0.0001066186,0.00004209864,0.00004465741,0.00008411377,0.00001161672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002165155,0.000138309,0.0006602121,0.00008688634,0.0000480298,0.00006305383,0.00006450573,0.06849626,0.08117177,0.004425418,0.0009508447,0.8436781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004640984,0.0001905115,0.0007823764,0.0000111179,0.00003019249,0.0001847501,0.00001722342,0.9593345,0.03388286,0.002104349,0.003399221,0.00001650471],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008615072,0.00007224684,0.9901917,0.00002206068,0.00003095978,0.00002849272,0.000005320312,0.0004846422,0.0005494733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1842974,0.0001105832,0.8129132,0.0000579429,0.00005158101,0.0001048773,0.00004486785,0.00006181121,0.002357672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001880801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006291866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01860718663027883,"score_gpt":0.2377012326089516,"score_spread":0.2190940459786728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}