{"id":"W1894911349","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifp014","title":"Rural Income Volatility and Inequality in China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CESifo Economic Studies","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Ford Foundation","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Net national income; Volatility (finance); Demographic economics; China; Income distribution; Rural poverty; Survey data collection; Household income; Economic inequality; Rural area; Panel data; Labour economics; Inequality; Development economics; Econometrics; Geography; Economic growth; Public economics; Statistics; Gross income","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770152,0.0001402744,0.0003834052,0.00006408026,0.0004034489,0.00004954281,0.0001484136,0.00007585887,0.00007568009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002270779,0.0001324457,0.00005074567,0.00008548317,0.0005074884,0.0003292136,0.0001209363,0.0001080726,0.00002745727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004271016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007284032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04045891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06238066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986017,0.0002655015,0.0004498519,0.0002569631,0.00009113938,0.0003348444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993784,0.0002413986,0.0001277943,0.0001745051,0.00002981329,0.00004804772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001425042,0.00002966579,0.9642988,0.00002987136,0.00001726526,8.97866e-7,0.009940707,0.000005643344,0.000003022833,0.02425097,0.0006511679,0.000757755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003222639,0.00001532054,0.9536064,0.00001506584,0.000006195211,1.951488e-7,0.005740532,0.00009430011,0.00001425512,0.0365543,0.003460634,0.0001704987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971665,0.001678761,0.000003791568,0.001065923,0.00051981,0.0001696675,0.00001988035,0.00004621597,0.024831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983431,0.0005284203,0.00003566844,0.0000861403,0.0004218333,0.00001513292,0.000003002568,0.000005948153,0.0005607595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02667815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03605334964226364,"score_gpt":0.3255275841943804,"score_spread":0.2894742345521167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}