{"id":"W1895128355","doi":"10.22230/jem.2006v7n2a543","title":"Predicting the risk of wet ground areas in the Vanderhoof Forest District: Project description and progress report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Government of Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Logging; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Forestry; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001678357,0.00008289549,0.0001453088,0.00005299466,0.0001623566,0.00004247055,0.0001185137,0.00002123985,0.000002485515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001198121,0.00004093926,0.00003497309,0.0001117332,0.000106721,0.0001628995,0.000131776,0.00008923881,3.726605e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003018155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001581672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001339138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003341677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999026,0.0001113154,0.0004107944,0.0001124725,0.0002137924,0.0001256291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.00003809887,0.0004804502,0.0001116063,0.000007573911,0.00001180603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268874,0.00007879211,0.9945754,0.00008490255,0.00007238692,0.0001028443,0.0004889591,0.000339081,0.000002082939,0.0003566382,0.0030709,0.0008052706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973587,0.0001329066,0.9862723,0.00006231306,0.0001357374,0.0001375516,0.001626755,0.0008561153,0.000001582377,0.001081993,0.009245551,0.000049826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940966,0.0004084617,0.0002897696,0.0005395756,0.0001083956,0.0004944619,0.000001465718,0.000003009716,0.004058278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991343,0.0005516506,0.00006625684,0.00001699255,0.00004779086,0.00002210843,0.000001135688,0.000003221583,0.0001565161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008303143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2024384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01099727676864954,"score_gpt":0.2139678626602844,"score_spread":0.2029705858916349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}