{"id":"W1895128355","doi":"10.22230/jem.2006v7n2a543","title":"Predicting the risk of wet ground areas in the Vanderhoof Forest District: Project description and progress report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Government of Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Logging; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Forestry; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083778,0.0004406233,0.0002982398,0.0007897411,0.0004787805,0.0009280227,0.0006293332,0.0004218881,0.0009675822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002086737,0.0002460221,0.0002590046,0.001056504,0.0002316131,0.0004155231,0.0003702247,0.0002866053,0.000207912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001723503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004228713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5122741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.523814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995938,0.0001382149,0.00002435682,0.00006379621,0.00009467301,0.00008524526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988662,0.0003939786,0.0001153952,0.00008502397,0.0003091545,0.0002303573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002245657,0.0006338992,0.7337952,0.0000878551,0.00009615319,0.0002167573,0.0003765776,0.2116761,0.0009434601,0.0003653326,0.003073216,0.04851094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001284967,0.0003737652,0.4172015,0.00003548177,0.000103189,0.00009883391,0.002328665,0.5729001,0.003382646,0.0003855992,0.003003109,0.00005856821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926292,0.00004782093,0.002121881,0.00007301862,0.000001888429,0.0001682862,0.003674224,0.0001197641,0.001164068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811842,0.0001090211,0.00778932,0.000009327975,0.000002731577,0.000147047,0.009506155,0.00001386837,0.001238273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01099727676864954,"score_gpt":0.2139678626602844,"score_spread":0.2029705858916349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}