{"id":"W1895300119","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00308.x","title":"Optimizing clinical trial design for assessing the efficacy of functional foods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nutrition Reviews","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Observational study; Clinical trial; Clinical study design; Research design; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Randomized controlled trial; Surgery; Statistics; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3443659,0.002175941,0.01016445,0.003321009,0.0007857187,0.004621034,0.002691701,0.006426071,0.004549356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4957737,0.001504346,0.006703409,0.003871993,0.002768163,0.004226348,0.00218903,0.005616587,0.001087258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002680672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00774439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005641569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006586359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4409914,0.4929919,0.04136631,0.006029505,0.0178758,0.0007451809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.423416,0.514661,0.02936076,0.01758285,0.01360265,0.001376743],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02511415,0.0009226436,0.006379,0.1682756,0.02403,0.0003564032,0.0007124674,0.01352217,0.003536836,0.03726444,0.01355789,0.7063285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1338458,0.02757786,0.03146833,0.1848255,0.07506387,0.001777707,0.0008984401,0.05188225,0.01163278,0.2305239,0.2492916,0.001212097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01046137,0.3826253,0.4416265,0.01295623,0.008909133,0.1319833,0.001177539,0.0007538238,0.009506718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08207805,0.08477224,0.660665,0.007230509,0.002445812,0.1608174,0.0006365667,0.0001761561,0.001178315],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8085135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4558094131584761,"score_gpt":0.5129070538176478,"score_spread":0.05709764065917167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}