{"id":"W1896758939","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00781.x","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Global English: Language Politics in Globalisation Debates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Globalization; Public sphere; Language politics; Sociology; Metaphor; State (computer science); Sociology of language; Global politics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Law; Language education; Comprehension approach; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002595197,0.00009864494,0.0001650421,0.00003627907,0.0002297063,0.00005112835,0.00008236519,0.00006809505,0.00002119459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003207113,0.00009257057,0.00002653737,0.0001813839,0.0003911738,0.00009402834,0.00002477404,0.00007053336,0.00001227777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000469365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001154475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008765336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001775788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987578,0.0001322078,0.0001842811,0.0001553853,0.0001852575,0.0005851041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993151,0.0002213018,0.0000244222,0.00007707615,0.0001129061,0.0002491573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001817843,0.00004480488,0.00845297,0.000006062706,0.000005945943,0.000001954562,0.05627101,1.268584e-7,0.000001189958,0.9330756,0.0002982299,0.001840276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005060935,0.0000671532,0.1445331,0.00004138945,0.00002333366,0.0000019355,0.3164217,0.00001521975,0.00006908293,0.5106684,0.02736013,0.0002925059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896082,0.001779176,0.000003098625,0.01525963,0.0002766667,0.0001347224,0.00002473393,0.00008528866,0.1928285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951801,0.0001528192,0.0001319361,0.003455357,0.0007016305,0.000004125469,0.000002835685,0.000002611871,0.0003685343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4224072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07267821476621121,"score_gpt":0.4894183011300244,"score_spread":0.4167400863638132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}