{"id":"W1897988923","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1352","title":"Development of an effects-based approach for watershed scale aquatic cumulative effects assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Structural basin; Aquatic ecosystem; Water quality; Drainage basin; Baseline (sea); Current (fluid); Hydrology (agriculture); Scale (ratio); Water resource management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Ecology; Geology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009769655,0.001441831,0.002208725,0.0002546816,0.0004940539,0.0001142007,0.0007210501,0.0004731957,0.0002841722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002988802,0.001152884,0.0005471563,0.000301428,0.0005399156,0.0005717615,0.0007904012,0.0005326169,0.00005768404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003123937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007046392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005673696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001591599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943376,0.0005429483,0.001444475,0.001373728,0.001189499,0.001111817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975641,0.0002282867,0.0009185388,0.0007384372,0.000003665118,0.0005470093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003166379,0.003448871,0.001104151,0.01145639,0.0009115964,0.00001007386,0.0004297079,0.00008901204,0.0002550684,0.00006300031,0.00006698164,0.9821335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008073137,0.002389879,0.0237981,0.006038932,0.01337497,0.00001747774,0.002555156,0.01239446,0.001056645,0.0002482662,0.9240344,0.006018568],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03842254,0.5789219,0.2919056,0.00004537022,0.002195076,0.0602933,0.0008136852,0.0006982916,0.02670426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01981492,0.3714776,0.5930701,0.0001549751,0.0001186048,0.00677951,0.007105716,0.0003787215,0.001099838],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02819539039784908,"score_gpt":0.3311726574236617,"score_spread":0.3029772670258126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}