{"id":"W1898171276","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2012-0075","title":"A Bayesian modelling framework for the estimation of catch-at-age of commercially harvested fish species","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Havforskningsinstituttet","keywords":"Stock assessment; Statistics; Otolith; Bayesian probability; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Econometrics; Fish stock; North sea; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Bayesian hierarchical modeling; Mathematics; Environmental science; Bayesian inference; Geography; Biology; Fishing; Oceanography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01623743,0.001802088,0.002579667,0.003426535,0.001220412,0.003217564,0.006779665,0.003086881,0.004905559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02591214,0.002111693,0.003271351,0.003623054,0.001833976,0.00312357,0.002095954,0.003374771,0.001485162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004085389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05057647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05462325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953029,0.002403375,0.0003396764,0.0007933535,0.0008328725,0.0003277513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871867,0.00977434,0.00115174,0.0004591509,0.001153247,0.0002747485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004290675,0.00005239002,0.00222947,0.0001281142,0.0001879777,0.000172577,0.0002500826,0.8074332,0.0004450511,0.16326,0.001612075,0.02418625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001870372,0.00003888602,0.0007512635,0.00004595254,0.00004739653,0.00008118631,0.00002579595,0.9236723,0.00008533134,0.07247981,0.002705289,0.00004803515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002172826,0.0002273592,0.9961562,0.0001772378,0.00002333713,0.00007564016,0.0003013537,0.0001273759,0.000738622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.182142,0.001710859,0.8001172,0.0002631739,0.0002261482,0.001977316,0.002120866,0.0002466787,0.01119574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05057647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1005642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05200250831385358,"score_gpt":0.2634138266192547,"score_spread":0.2114113183054011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}