{"id":"W1899052890","doi":"10.4236/cus.2015.33019","title":"An Indicator Model of the Spatial Quantification and Pattern Analysis of Urban Sustainability: A Case Study of Cincinnati, Ohio","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Urban Studies","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Census; Urban sustainability; Regional science; Work (physics); Geography; Cartography; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Sociology; Population; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000410971,0.0001038441,0.0003594139,0.00007857387,0.00007255395,0.000006000193,0.0001734865,0.00002163952,0.000005611785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003842474,0.00006372458,0.00005226023,0.0003785349,0.00008955681,0.0001072195,0.0002258958,0.00004432733,4.335884e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006797781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001815473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003373808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01361033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988456,0.0001209754,0.0003881319,0.0002395298,0.0003007788,0.0001049493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.00003688308,0.000355202,0.0004096512,0.00008659105,0.00005168959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001148513,0.0005652682,0.9519974,0.0001169205,0.0002600205,0.000001393109,0.04168781,0.003224279,0.00003024981,0.000004824857,0.0000725734,0.00202778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009914198,0.0005023393,0.6865955,0.00003748178,0.002175056,0.000003048857,0.1049679,0.2039191,0.0004430927,0.0001034597,0.00003921028,0.0002223148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986417,0.0007095037,0.0001596777,0.00002443478,0.00006321989,0.0003522498,0.00003472898,0.00000551855,0.00000899537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9999319,0.00002048472,0.000003935351,0.000002860326,0.00001091353,0.00001997928,0.0000030304,0.000004110679,0.000002740536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2654019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7594886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06369591442800684,"score_gpt":0.3166775915034316,"score_spread":0.2529816770754247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}