{"id":"W1899158120","doi":"","title":"R v Kapp : a model for South African affirmative action jurisprudence?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Judgement; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Remedial education; Order (exchange); Dual (grammatical number); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045584,0.0007174474,0.000816607,0.001993775,0.008961207,0.01054539,0.002909746,0.01230534,0.009232057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093403,0.0005591649,0.001107571,0.001731515,0.03273569,0.01630376,0.006300464,0.01280527,0.00187784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009773173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02340161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01695577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931442,0.003189637,0.0001476567,0.0009328065,0.001212717,0.001373126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968105,0.001722753,0.0002830286,0.0004855928,0.000391178,0.0003069645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001830585,0.000001837073,0.00001248586,0.000004110571,5.020095e-7,0.00001790839,0.0005201088,0.0000340345,0.00001216137,0.9985682,0.0004708375,0.0003561378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132783,0.00001030932,0.00007420556,0.00007382045,0.00000324496,0.00007327532,0.001029404,0.0007472315,0.00007466791,0.9577361,0.04014468,0.00001165527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01477339,0.00290524,0.06742036,0.1889564,0.000857662,0.0002318218,0.0001325722,0.00009183,0.7246307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781006,0.001750541,0.01790944,0.04052467,0.000663466,0.0007680385,0.00005361289,0.00008995689,0.0601397],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02340161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07090974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03067052080329672,"score_gpt":0.3434101125210649,"score_spread":0.3127395917177682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}