{"id":"W1900235314","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2015-0263","title":"Measurement and prediction of bark thickness in <i>Picea abies</i>: assessment of accuracy, precision, and sample size requirements","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Rural Affairs","keywords":"Bark (sound); Picea abies; Sampling (signal processing); Tree (set theory); Mathematics; Sample size determination; Accuracy and precision; Sample (material); Standard deviation; Statistics; Environmental science; Soil science; Botany; Forestry; Geography; Chemistry; Computer science; Biology; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392939,0.0005253617,0.0005336371,0.0006442601,0.0003438395,0.0009235677,0.0007659398,0.000382701,0.0003326696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006699194,0.0002929519,0.0004559031,0.0006644698,0.0004314016,0.0004049526,0.0005199272,0.0003103568,0.0002008942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004826291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004993113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01607809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03334386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985733,0.0004292312,0.00009658752,0.0005011612,0.0003364147,0.00006332075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960886,0.002115302,0.0005756891,0.0004820765,0.0006545763,0.00008366454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003352058,0.0001368915,0.7638346,0.0003293069,0.0003392339,0.0003300758,0.0005698088,0.07572588,0.05638466,0.000301218,0.000402967,0.1013102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002233117,0.0002080412,0.8551472,0.00005315596,0.0001297257,0.0002515753,0.0003240017,0.1257045,0.01620712,0.0003586332,0.001551641,0.00004210223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387707,0.0004125244,0.05908275,0.00002639211,0.00001258513,0.00008876157,0.0007332789,0.0002266874,0.000646382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462046,0.0002045912,0.05215343,0.00003524107,0.000009120231,0.0001566653,0.001004964,0.0000273321,0.0002042116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01607809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03196901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08794346090697387,"score_gpt":0.3377777432744553,"score_spread":0.2498342823674814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}