{"id":"W1901650289","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4657","title":"CEAB-INSPIRED RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING DESIGN DOSSIERS IN CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Capstone; Accreditation; Documentation; Presentation (obstetrics); Task (project management); Computer science; Work (physics); Engineering management; Engineering design process; Process (computing); Engineering; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Systems engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02884115,0.001506992,0.001040967,0.01440291,0.001468791,0.004544699,0.002434923,0.001333225,0.003983982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1880441,0.000622305,0.0007289088,0.007039949,0.0009225901,0.002465552,0.003160868,0.002133279,0.002937081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00333685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002976631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005103308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01199353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9528703,0.02188308,0.004639321,0.002085262,0.01774306,0.0007790182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8455887,0.05609585,0.01431358,0.01473414,0.06577246,0.00349531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004170806,0.0009808352,0.01568252,0.001628303,0.00009081364,0.0001851464,0.006850278,0.01136752,0.02070826,0.007415891,0.02181036,0.912863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006298157,0.003826428,0.2771508,0.004016384,0.0002220313,0.001888159,0.01598556,0.2820503,0.07350082,0.02985364,0.3094472,0.00142887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2955123,0.002329858,0.5996649,0.001276296,0.0007122469,0.008064203,0.003861476,0.02088339,0.06769533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3067434,0.0004563137,0.6769895,0.000267485,0.00006522251,0.003498595,0.003980142,0.001375951,0.006623414],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02884115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1525284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01515010662989182,"score_gpt":0.2269464711383501,"score_spread":0.2117963645084583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}