{"id":"W1901650289","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4657","title":"CEAB-INSPIRED RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING DESIGN DOSSIERS IN CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Capstone; Accreditation; Documentation; Presentation (obstetrics); Task (project management); Computer science; Work (physics); Engineering management; Engineering design process; Process (computing); Engineering; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Systems engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009701654,0.0002209037,0.0002164963,0.0004587157,0.0001220991,0.0001197581,0.0002579937,0.0001913834,0.00001104985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008620813,0.0002365115,0.00007229086,0.0007748416,0.00001188348,0.0004706105,0.00001024144,0.0002223032,0.000005571963],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004510035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006747622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005270703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002343322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986064,0.000009469039,0.0003753799,0.0001501563,0.0002652979,0.0005933301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990168,0.0001283902,0.0001618101,0.00009651235,0.0003091274,0.0002873599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007932549,0.0004176528,0.2003807,0.001719206,0.0003860663,1.635739e-7,0.01421778,0.5183914,0.01891223,0.008866241,0.2311234,0.0055772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187942,0.00003378202,0.7276476,0.0009719528,0.0002043259,0.00001526534,0.002862825,0.148947,0.0378496,0.000298725,0.07805763,0.001923335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8841417,0.003118729,0.06520488,0.005618746,0.0282963,0.005672239,0.00007050429,0.001416182,0.006460751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710952,0.00002213341,0.02768792,0.0000921956,0.0002303708,0.0002984948,0.000009680734,0.00007068025,0.0004933013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5272669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01515010662989182,"score_gpt":0.2269464711383501,"score_spread":0.2117963645084583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}