{"id":"W1903180880","doi":"10.3846/16111699.2014.959994","title":"AVERSION TO THE VARIABILITY OF PAY AND THE STRUCTURE OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONTRACTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Executive compensation; Risk aversion (psychology); Variance (accounting); Compensation (psychology); Economics; Principal (computer security); Stock options; Microeconomics; Payment; Ex-ante; Stock (firearms); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Accounting; Computer science; Finance; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007603328,0.00007541835,0.0002277965,0.00006223297,0.00004429195,0.00005395244,0.0001342859,0.00001972121,0.000003343094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005966021,0.00003893968,0.00002930413,0.0001262708,0.00007686761,0.0003675516,0.0001284091,0.00004850726,5.615631e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001868789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001805631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001801792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007417765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994269,0.00001205188,0.0003284049,0.00008207384,0.00008468197,0.0000659064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998621,0.00004301667,0.0008806423,0.000120799,0.0003249086,0.000009646119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005050677,0.0002597808,0.07299931,0.001094612,0.0005413946,0.00001383021,0.001347486,0.05622783,0.0002687284,0.7941692,0.01656849,0.05145869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004194,0.00003068979,0.808444,0.0001290473,0.0002203352,0.000006723975,0.0006463911,0.003933886,0.00005664619,0.01918427,0.16302,0.0001340084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890224,0.00007400432,0.001762583,0.0077563,0.0003559696,0.0002777043,0.000006530725,0.00000129836,0.0007431764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984972,0.0006240084,0.0001437572,0.0005438394,0.0001557424,6.531005e-7,0.000001103856,0.000004069,0.0000296561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7749849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1587914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01240237866660493,"score_gpt":0.1843616509873519,"score_spread":0.1719592723207469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}