{"id":"W1903180880","doi":"10.3846/16111699.2014.959994","title":"AVERSION TO THE VARIABILITY OF PAY AND THE STRUCTURE OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONTRACTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Executive compensation; Risk aversion (psychology); Variance (accounting); Compensation (psychology); Economics; Principal (computer security); Stock options; Microeconomics; Payment; Ex-ante; Stock (firearms); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Accounting; Computer science; Finance; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00673379,0.0004227734,0.0006445312,0.0005745849,0.0006378304,0.00450295,0.0009237833,0.002093551,0.002916717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03593756,0.0005253642,0.0005160598,0.0005065572,0.003023416,0.003517895,0.001727055,0.003495204,0.0002590663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001631496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008951285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004391285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004145188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948902,0.00234317,0.0002941182,0.0005902255,0.001344028,0.0005382699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617803,0.02254851,0.009533595,0.003516172,0.001557148,0.001064316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001736263,0.0001225383,0.01243776,0.00006982339,0.00009376081,0.0002460347,0.0007083676,0.0420057,0.003319506,0.9182403,0.0006961292,0.02188649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005469166,0.0001671486,0.01119661,0.00004959779,0.00003118139,0.0003473707,0.0002194987,0.05635468,0.00088965,0.9278646,0.002765576,0.00005949731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5433596,0.0009446848,0.395813,0.004882223,0.00008180022,0.0000849892,0.0001193068,0.0001210494,0.05459325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901951,0.0001917567,0.007168244,0.0001374099,0.00006665508,0.00002195301,0.00002614688,0.00001388882,0.002178811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00673379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03561211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01240237866660493,"score_gpt":0.1843616509873519,"score_spread":0.1719592723207469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}