{"id":"W190481531","doi":"","title":"An ordered theory resolution calculus for hybrid reasoning in first-order extensions of description logic","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Automated theorem proving; Soundness; Automated reasoning; Computer science; Natural deduction; First-order logic; Completeness (order theory); Resolution (logic); Description logic; Calculus (dental); Programming language; Context (archaeology); Inference; Gödel's completeness theorem; Fragment (logic); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007786226,0.0006624925,0.001086341,0.002446435,0.002952554,0.005490297,0.003316811,0.001586037,0.004751153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01099652,0.0010521,0.003189436,0.002538641,0.005429582,0.007661882,0.005661865,0.004601659,0.001167542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00300209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004278379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00454521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005960219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947466,0.001506785,0.0004873923,0.0005443167,0.002309028,0.0004058575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941319,0.003533524,0.0002434995,0.0009966505,0.0008076285,0.0002867243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020242,0.00003657883,0.0001205878,0.00005967428,0.00002528906,0.0001762658,0.000276446,0.00394824,0.0008682421,0.9780654,0.001575068,0.01482788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005400457,0.00002414301,0.00008512884,0.00005066191,0.00007846671,0.0001662968,0.0001016049,0.06482074,0.00329365,0.9067417,0.02452652,0.00005713389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00355667,0.0003738052,0.9873556,0.0005586176,0.0002385801,0.0001339763,0.000133667,0.0007711126,0.006877799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1438106,0.0008001022,0.845247,0.0006433258,0.0003780576,0.0003510894,0.0005041862,0.0002872788,0.00797832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007786226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04117799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02395656221713579,"score_gpt":0.2614089127337204,"score_spread":0.2374523505165846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}