{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004622879,0.0001094215,0.0006465355,0.00005942663,0.0001262929,0.00001633762,0.0002153867,0.00002627835,0.0002292197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001766292,0.00008243007,0.0003710757,0.0003055713,0.0002256545,0.0001129232,0.00007757099,0.00007610568,0.00004592851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008344439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004383451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003952768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00001317823,0.0008324897,0.0001993912,0.00003564406,0.0001195661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00004523142,0.0004940167,0.0002326394,0.0000502707,0.00002850429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002140902,0.00007773979,0.001246975,0.0002292008,0.0007091568,2.091853e-7,0.00003552261,0.001125071,0.000001692147,0.9961612,0.0001127948,0.0002983516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003980129,0.00004911243,0.005866369,0.0005149152,0.0005131662,0.000001971292,0.0000113293,0.0001259131,0.00009006458,0.06141085,0.9308075,0.0002107954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400176,0.6021196,0.001917918,0.02691048,0.000294349,0.001681146,0.0009004991,0.00003242508,0.3261259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537252,0.04387436,0.0006483215,0.001523729,0.00003908475,0.0000611078,0.00004147282,0.000005449494,0.00008123232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3361401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03694648439122424,"score_gpt":0.2342655574391061,"score_spread":0.1973190730478819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}