{"id":"W1906288479","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2015-0171","title":"Uncertainty of upland soil carbon sink estimate for Finland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil carbon; Litter; Soil water; Stock (firearms); Carbon sink; Plant litter; Carbon cycle; Soil science; Forest inventory; Understory; Carbon sequestration; Atmospheric sciences; Forestry; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Ecology; Forest management; Agroforestry; Canopy; Geography; Carbon dioxide; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003887971,0.0004406594,0.0005216487,0.001390319,0.0004422666,0.001186785,0.0006197926,0.0005981626,0.0006584567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007002329,0.0002917687,0.0009123425,0.0008416413,0.0004069368,0.001067342,0.000878285,0.0002911288,0.0001273402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02980648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01738026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992523,0.0001430478,0.00008750761,0.0002441368,0.0001784352,0.00009456353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.002022516,0.000294814,0.0002316528,0.0004093103,0.00006314581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005002534,0.00004452714,0.2916978,0.000348765,0.0006180764,0.0007192836,0.0003656457,0.6709762,0.008420466,0.004377628,0.0007139278,0.02121744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000717244,0.000123888,0.2761247,0.0001570136,0.0003713586,0.0003868641,0.0004440574,0.6963307,0.01198564,0.01088155,0.00292695,0.000195536],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870488,0.000287547,0.009310607,0.00009119571,0.00001007244,0.00001175295,0.001866487,0.000103378,0.001270231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969559,0.00004565284,0.00158226,0.00001245733,0.000002735695,0.0000082637,0.00128829,0.00001037415,0.0000941818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02980648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05926603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08490804838485493,"score_gpt":0.3174944836141981,"score_spread":0.2325864352293431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}