{"id":"W1908513371","doi":"10.4141/cjas2011-040","title":"A comparison of commonly used and novel electronic techniques for evaluating cattle temperament","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph; Lethbridge College; Thompson Rivers University; Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Temperament; Accelerometer; Statistics; Strain gauge; Linear regression; Regression analysis; Mathematics; Animal science; Psychology; Physics; Personality; Biology; Structural engineering; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00393409,0.0007374226,0.0005479429,0.001830997,0.0002133919,0.0005981221,0.0006591785,0.0005867112,0.0007738659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004585381,0.000280224,0.0006153279,0.001273721,0.000312209,0.0005209796,0.0006921768,0.0005230316,0.0002221419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003204733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008379263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003663362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950252,0.002126385,0.0004058519,0.0005708385,0.001752526,0.0001191327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937226,0.002281887,0.001936446,0.0004202358,0.001430232,0.0002086022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00377765,0.001498012,0.5217241,0.001258458,0.00131009,0.0001445247,0.0007771464,0.001906374,0.1633194,0.0003530692,0.0007657427,0.3031655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001810665,0.008988614,0.9418403,0.0002596787,0.0006657601,0.001024268,0.0006706893,0.008984959,0.03449333,0.0003192884,0.002455508,0.0001164982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564015,0.004273438,0.03499585,0.0001091974,0.0001247768,0.0004041768,0.0007875531,0.0001024164,0.002801146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8954685,0.003532001,0.09706267,0.0001338709,0.0001004352,0.0007299708,0.0009354629,0.0000366944,0.0020004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00393409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02080566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1779235528544032,"score_gpt":0.4437234186783824,"score_spread":0.2657998658239793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}