{"id":"W1908623813","doi":"10.22230/jem.2009v10n2a421","title":"Forest management and maintenance of ectomycorrhizae: A case study of green tree retention in south-coastal British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Colonization; Microsite; Species richness; Context (archaeology); Transect; Biology; Colonisation; Clearcutting; Ecology; Forestry; Horticulture; Geography; Seedling","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002566695,0.0003369827,0.0002719051,0.0007692197,0.003232584,0.0009592006,0.0009335384,0.0004289655,0.0009425024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005999883,0.0001902825,0.0001278475,0.001699674,0.001071936,0.0002163889,0.0006831976,0.0004815751,0.00009904755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008494909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005245466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9441918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996675,0.00004352437,0.0000117159,0.00004835643,0.00006739156,0.0001614344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993522,0.00008589357,0.0001047639,0.00003241705,0.0001818944,0.0002428654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002128742,0.0002667079,0.9428005,0.0001100127,0.00006231387,0.007455615,0.01419071,0.0003364014,0.008202585,0.0002569365,0.000781704,0.02532371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000464919,0.0000659983,0.9840803,0.00002788482,0.00001816047,0.000577156,0.01367536,0.0002286445,0.0002670218,0.00002628956,0.001016572,0.00001190217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992971,0.0000934589,0.00002494707,0.00003174286,5.834281e-7,0.00000831016,0.00004310911,0.000001384312,0.0004993505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987639,0.0001639881,0.000120551,0.00004049634,8.451914e-7,0.000006736453,0.00006988431,0.000001704015,0.0008320123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05580819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1122736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01003830781046274,"score_gpt":0.1930392775005149,"score_spread":0.1830009696900521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}