{"id":"W1909252891","doi":"10.1139/f2011-135","title":"Nutrient status of phytoplankton across a trophic gradient in Lake Erie: evidence from new fluorescence methods","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Phytoplankton; Nutrient; Trophic level; Ecology; Chlorophyll a; Environmental science; Phosphorus; Plankton; Nitrate; Range (aeronautics); Oceanography; Biology; Chemistry; Botany; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007697344,0.0001621873,0.0002815658,0.0009769496,0.0003620616,0.0004605012,0.0003202104,0.0004575145,0.0001317334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001594303,0.0002902541,0.0001367288,0.0008111259,0.0005942519,0.0004239645,0.000740597,0.0002440373,0.0000372668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005711243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003363762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02235619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06224621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996243,0.00007773239,0.0000372861,0.00009017012,0.0001314259,0.00003907117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990273,0.0002869028,0.0003088459,0.00005037115,0.0002635459,0.00006309732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002604124,0.0000294471,0.9461352,0.000075676,0.00006611426,0.0001171256,0.00102162,0.0001572237,0.04054362,0.00005740947,0.00003599325,0.01150012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000236662,0.00005104856,0.9983441,0.000005959914,0.00001364451,0.00007379412,0.0002033196,0.0002331155,0.0008884126,0.0000196947,0.0001605261,0.00000407098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.0002909002,0.0001812408,0.00002750766,7.021065e-7,0.0000019202,0.00003071799,0.000002433362,0.0003211422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987491,0.0002901619,0.000742785,0.00003367441,0.000002059985,0.00000528185,0.00006354752,0.000001340516,0.0001120307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03330556052986314,"score_gpt":0.2846829330327693,"score_spread":0.2513773725029061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}