{"id":"W1911616118","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0552","title":"Comparative Effectiveness And Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Frequently Agree On Value","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Affairs","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Cost effectiveness; Comparative effectiveness research; Outcomes research; Cost–benefit analysis; Quality-adjusted life year; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Medicine; Actuarial science; Value (mathematics); Health care; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4026247,0.002145357,0.01216299,0.01387267,0.001571184,0.01883263,0.00643881,0.009558212,0.004369087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7084591,0.00156807,0.006113566,0.0196953,0.0146956,0.01651168,0.007816169,0.01452575,0.0009626848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00774292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00454172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00158175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001077971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4386864,0.4324368,0.05173084,0.01392926,0.06064615,0.002570592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1765573,0.7558104,0.02469038,0.02751415,0.0145678,0.0008599497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001709767,0.0001971216,0.005758341,0.01199243,0.01280757,0.000315106,0.002462651,0.006874089,0.0003263537,0.8041421,0.0189539,0.1344607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000603534,0.0003110329,0.003712414,0.009864058,0.002071109,0.0003317901,0.001053043,0.005230806,0.0008817361,0.921849,0.05384878,0.0002427407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02356412,0.3204318,0.4610918,0.0989129,0.009991703,0.003523112,0.003516021,0.0004147108,0.07855389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5516225,0.05316511,0.316846,0.05452817,0.009919985,0.009301584,0.001588668,0.0005175696,0.002510376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5973753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7366701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6759083348840824,"score_gpt":0.5442382936312463,"score_spread":0.1316700412528361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}