{"id":"W1911705068","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1106","title":"Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":803,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba","keywords":"Grey literature; Systematic review; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Process (computing); Data science; Management science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6505072,0.0004181424,0.00634373,0.001137879,0.0005666972,0.003448298,0.002288557,0.0002083388,0.0006840758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.741722,0.0001847899,0.001972079,0.001228071,0.0001256443,0.0006703832,0.0003064251,0.0003449674,0.0007095443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005148207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006098198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006923514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008196474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.85653,0.1276027,0.007962733,0.001864409,0.005043385,0.0009968068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4121601,0.5644368,0.003853676,0.007554207,0.01111043,0.0008848078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009501728,0.0000404325,0.00002044669,0.04460454,0.0002644362,5.061901e-7,0.001607521,0.00000365194,0.0004499888,0.0144771,0.01383623,0.9246857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006844105,0.000547046,0.001839974,0.05602794,0.0009688631,0.00007502478,0.01202042,0.0776349,0.002316679,0.3401588,0.5062315,0.00149437],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004459862,0.6136814,0.311117,0.01190299,0.0003485329,0.0507247,0.0001022597,0.00003259572,0.007630589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009561552,0.01246366,0.9359971,0.0001123457,0.0003967708,0.02732175,0.000005876429,0.00007523696,0.01406571],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9427986778929087,"score_gpt":0.6848807056848404,"score_spread":0.2579179722080683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}