{"id":"W1911717992","doi":"10.7146/ocps.v7i1.2111","title":"Understanding Collaborative Practice: Reading between the Lines Actions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Outlines Critical Practice Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Korea Science and Engineering Foundation; University of Victoria","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Action (physics); Division of labour; Reading (process); Dialectic; Subjectivity; Collective action; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Artifact (error); Negotiation; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Political science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021729,0.001316862,0.0005917222,0.003027806,0.006925371,0.01438871,0.002504363,0.006056216,0.004645407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02561735,0.0005763145,0.000590539,0.001848293,0.05879843,0.02362667,0.007686883,0.005264077,0.000819738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00521942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005977964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005163501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003138587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9854125,0.01151712,0.0003950444,0.00107435,0.001149629,0.0004512717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979935,0.01536396,0.001053662,0.00180036,0.001254705,0.0005922373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002564836,0.00004769282,0.000805909,0.000205257,0.00001172314,0.0004081123,0.4546212,0.000522748,0.0007845752,0.5154676,0.001705694,0.0253938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002364712,0.0000867291,0.001082986,0.0007796409,0.00002154631,0.0006353057,0.2804247,0.001489389,0.001623053,0.5725588,0.1412319,0.00004235187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1402533,0.006041739,0.4530331,0.04226336,0.0007049041,0.0006689985,0.0001040547,0.0004308776,0.3564996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047657,0.001999927,0.08249722,0.00132556,0.0001254047,0.0003459621,0.0000822802,0.0001457112,0.008712226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01438871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05403489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2627390078146029,"score_gpt":0.4592811847661201,"score_spread":0.1965421769515172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}