{"id":"W1912237055","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.026","title":"Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Victoria Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Appendicitis; Retrospective cohort study; Radiology; Receiver operating characteristic; Pregnancy; Predictive value of tests; Abdominal pain; Acute appendicitis; Positive predicative value; Predictive value; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000311537,0.0001058639,0.0005348565,0.0004773118,0.00002122444,0.000007513128,0.0001014964,0.00002172301,0.0000278976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001125105,0.00009027972,0.00005405264,0.0005097567,0.000276888,0.00007305957,0.00007438686,0.000181222,0.000002392855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001200157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007999938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001239081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987641,0.00007760197,0.0005187603,0.0001514492,0.0002901432,0.0001979703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986086,0.0005290565,0.0003820017,0.0001168338,0.0002022486,0.0001612277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006622761,0.0006222142,0.7956623,0.000009145597,0.00004653701,0.001694479,0.0005400605,0.0000080429,0.00001193875,0.0003984391,0.0001973894,0.2007432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006663398,0.006621613,0.9769849,0.0001752753,0.000192178,0.0002314933,0.004348137,0.0001081048,0.00001063122,0.00009969697,0.004469387,0.00009519776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876062,0.01042894,0.0001110563,0.0003830242,0.0003889133,0.0003043133,0.000007435461,0.000003585327,0.0007665217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966136,0.001387591,0.0017295,0.0001927005,0.00002068336,0.000007661853,0.000001531679,0.000009196999,0.00003751555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.200648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01707980952268891,"score_gpt":0.2837957888395969,"score_spread":0.266715979316908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}