{"id":"W1914235900","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0327","title":"An alternative method for determining particle-size distribution of forest road aggregate and soil with large-sized particles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil and Unsaturated Flow","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Sieve (category theory); Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Particle-size distribution; Soil water; Soil test; Sieve analysis; Particle (ecology); Particle size; Soil science; Mathematics; Materials science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001294613,0.0007116059,0.0006552625,0.002663867,0.0007293313,0.0009661806,0.0009567104,0.0006791471,0.001584555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00262171,0.0003878622,0.000397186,0.001985949,0.0004684259,0.001172286,0.0007710467,0.000784433,0.0006914911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006196901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00123454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04696543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969906,0.0002433084,0.0001890278,0.0008980087,0.001560205,0.0001189553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972588,0.000447929,0.0003543764,0.0003001136,0.001506685,0.0001320332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003732226,0.0004899498,0.07163509,0.0006292629,0.0002070424,0.0003003831,0.001039247,0.001328524,0.6214531,0.002732382,0.001965116,0.2978466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001751348,0.001517487,0.3663496,0.0002728458,0.0006885034,0.003651585,0.001544733,0.05489462,0.5209406,0.002568258,0.04689171,0.0005048722],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2644921,0.001843487,0.721028,0.0001824767,0.0003952576,0.00102257,0.002404285,0.001410317,0.007221606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3192882,0.001394959,0.669025,0.0003092021,0.00006785198,0.0009371805,0.001440708,0.0001692338,0.007367708],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0271188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03026376840250561,"score_gpt":0.302718680659924,"score_spread":0.2724549122574184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}