{"id":"W1915182874","doi":"10.1002/env.1149","title":"Conditional likelihood approach for analyzing single visit abundance survey data in the presence of zero inflation and detection error","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmetrics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negative binomial distribution; Count data; Poisson distribution; Estimator; Statistics; Covariate; Poisson regression; Econometrics; Zero-inflated model; Computer science; Population; Inflation (cosmology); Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001833134,0.00006891889,0.0000839792,0.0000704971,0.0001069562,0.00001094938,0.000212348,0.00007385323,0.00003278297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007311479,0.00006030202,0.00001276609,0.0004856811,0.0001373007,0.0005977537,0.0001181895,0.0000895715,0.000007789103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004820657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003473699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001244551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001503907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991295,0.0001627672,0.0001789797,0.000193809,0.0001707062,0.0001641868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998958,0.0006260863,0.0001265806,0.0002573878,0.000003766321,0.00002816264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148805,0.0001275016,0.9934802,0.000005881382,0.000003747827,5.356974e-8,0.0002201932,0.001096107,0.0006203785,0.00001479407,0.000117931,0.0042983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001695977,0.00003956143,0.9858352,0.000001325249,0.00001146454,0.000002297652,0.00004796904,0.0131313,0.0001860418,0.0002077734,0.0003009187,0.0000665248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8479107,0.0001045723,0.1515535,0.00003322679,0.00003557045,0.0002211202,0.00004388429,0.000003958538,0.00009345952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960868,0.00001547943,0.003506131,0.00007447969,0.00002614417,0.00002071243,0.0002486712,0.00000510234,0.00001647711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1481761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2459045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0533789487145034,"score_gpt":0.2622836558124439,"score_spread":0.2089047070979406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}