{"id":"W1917589669","doi":"10.5194/piahs-371-83-2015","title":"Frequency of floods in a changing climate: a case study from the Red River in Manitoba, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Precipitation; Coupled model intercomparison project; Climate change; Snow; Climatology; Flood myth; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Spring (device); Climate model; Range (aeronautics); Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Meteorology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004760426,0.0003512335,0.0002876123,0.001211597,0.00301327,0.001228779,0.001274027,0.0006857589,0.0009813878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115595,0.0002641827,0.0004566858,0.004166092,0.0009219465,0.0003241721,0.0006779284,0.000701308,0.0001072243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03007106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01958015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996451,0.00006106896,0.00001769709,0.00004935922,0.00009603036,0.0001306112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999124,0.0001716278,0.00008116438,0.00003567899,0.000387572,0.0001999827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001136017,0.0001876991,0.9603344,0.0001144133,0.0001612588,0.00584649,0.005601989,0.01048525,0.001022638,0.0007646294,0.002549138,0.01281849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002430147,0.00005068607,0.9613832,0.00005269447,0.00007811636,0.000621594,0.02052314,0.01375491,0.0003023927,0.0001867331,0.002962561,0.00005969499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968869,0.0001694232,0.0001403119,0.0003213711,0.000004928068,0.0000320735,0.000939086,0.00001254995,0.001493383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975279,0.0002986663,0.0004210713,0.00009530411,0.000004656139,0.0000138658,0.0006839699,0.000006691705,0.0009478949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03007106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2181818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0371077703039214,"score_gpt":0.2478418572975163,"score_spread":0.2107340869935949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}