{"id":"W1917589669","doi":"10.5194/piahs-371-83-2015","title":"Frequency of floods in a changing climate: a case study from the Red River in Manitoba, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Precipitation; Coupled model intercomparison project; Climate change; Snow; Climatology; Flood myth; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Spring (device); Climate model; Range (aeronautics); Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Meteorology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002673294,0.00005921518,0.0001315569,0.00004168903,0.0000576841,0.00001253992,0.0006240842,0.00003735599,0.0000496899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001046832,0.00003407806,0.00003008096,0.0005234114,0.0001626294,0.0001816003,0.0004010767,0.00009060001,5.279028e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005101721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003686541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5323133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5095531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984961,0.00003401352,0.0003482612,0.0001746253,0.0007820617,0.0001650071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999243,0.0002466051,0.0003943194,0.00004126783,0.00005392985,0.00002090061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008439079,0.0001533485,0.9942476,0.000001198364,0.000005650216,0.000002077545,0.00201039,0.001802752,0.001376545,0.0003060356,0.0000537563,0.00003218682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006942227,0.0001361316,0.9399545,0.00003425032,0.00001437996,0.000007793025,0.01361342,0.02048206,0.001120219,0.02381903,0.00002321521,0.0001007631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943033,0.000004629658,3.068805e-7,0.002611195,0.0001048407,0.0002031597,0.00001936748,0.000002681171,0.002750465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997337,0.000002550511,0.0001350829,0.00009258966,0.00001263586,0.00001116161,4.220329e-7,0.000001209075,0.00001068754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0542931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4993963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0371077703039214,"score_gpt":0.2478418572975163,"score_spread":0.2107340869935949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}