{"id":"W1918657735","doi":"10.3968/j.sms.1923845220120201.009","title":"The Natural Frequency of Elastic Plates with Void by Ritz-Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in mathematical sciences","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Isotropy; Rayleigh–Ritz method; Flexural rigidity; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Vibration; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Void (composites); Ritz method; Fundamental frequency; Natural frequency; Materials science; Physics; Boundary value problem; Acoustics; Composite material; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004749964,0.0004804504,0.0004226057,0.0004504723,0.000197398,0.0003231311,0.0009269645,0.0007414401,0.002110814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006643055,0.0002520154,0.0006071349,0.0002899828,0.000727464,0.0007645703,0.0004938052,0.0006570967,0.0005541563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004947081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999858,0.00005482992,0.000004954659,0.00001701762,0.00005048794,0.00001459876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998215,0.00008551998,0.00002219145,0.00002378569,0.00003908022,0.000007932083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008355583,0.00007120812,0.001144254,0.0002854236,0.00004389733,0.0002031692,0.0002078432,0.7154739,0.02908886,0.2018894,0.001802169,0.04970623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004490308,0.00001327207,0.0001007054,0.000005570289,0.000002821929,0.00003326157,0.00001247671,0.9918867,0.001306216,0.005489584,0.001138888,0.000005965462],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01987031,0.0001506903,0.9757455,0.00007435733,0.00003719837,0.00002889639,0.00003205257,0.00007928495,0.003981682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4528477,0.0005233884,0.5300752,0.0001002515,0.00006074484,0.000367574,0.0001474218,0.0002219494,0.01565567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002110814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007061362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01917835982493825,"score_gpt":0.2817234873571856,"score_spread":0.2625451275322473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}