{"id":"W1918668959","doi":"10.4141/cjas-2015-100","title":"Review: Recent advances in evaluation of bags made from different textiles used in situ ruminal degradation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rumen; Neutral Detergent Fiber; In situ; Dry matter; Degradation (telecommunications); Organic matter; Incubation; Chemistry; Animal science; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Food science; Biology; Fermentation; Biochemistry; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169828,0.00006685327,0.0001855538,0.0000805,0.00004192765,0.00001814076,0.0002539276,0.00002771038,0.0001069077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005501759,0.00002938579,0.00002936149,0.0005726133,0.0001978614,0.0004156323,0.0000109391,0.00008691056,0.000001945775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002398106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003751153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002059198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08030315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988381,0.000146849,0.0003234183,0.0001356515,0.0003631622,0.0001927743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990231,0.00006304356,0.0002111233,0.00002715408,0.0003910107,0.0002846052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006209392,0.0000586552,0.07241189,0.000008214579,9.0191e-7,0.000006840641,0.0001203569,0.00001777751,0.8424426,0.0001121445,0.0002713373,0.08448714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002501088,0.0004483217,0.9870669,0.0004388561,0.000006581255,0.000006239914,0.0004957193,0.00007531728,0.00674394,0.001155566,0.003244527,0.00006796936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812855,0.01641712,7.085317e-7,0.001837169,0.00009191335,0.0001104037,0.00001471033,8.917548e-7,0.0002415754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969391,0.002863421,0.00002443251,0.0001190342,0.00004257813,0.000002031167,0.000007860767,3.014781e-7,0.000001193837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.914655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08257892270345027,"score_gpt":0.3033317669024749,"score_spread":0.2207528441990247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}