{"id":"W1919725085","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02460.x","title":"Carbon sequestration potential of tropical pasture compared with afforestation in Panama","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute","keywords":"Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Afforestation; Carbon sink; Ecosystem respiration; Eddy covariance; Ecosystem; Pasture; Primary production; Soil carbon; Carbon cycle; Agroforestry; Biomass (ecology); Agronomy; Ecology; Soil water; Biology; Soil science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002604955,0.0002143432,0.0001551258,0.0004813739,0.0002280753,0.0004000471,0.000115086,0.0001484396,0.0008048628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003732594,0.00008209536,0.0001405876,0.0005588442,0.0001746577,0.0002995875,0.0002803839,0.0000931271,0.00004407102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003121667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001190161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01052416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01890412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999325,0.00001914113,0.00000729841,0.0000179349,0.000007343785,0.00001577711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997556,0.00004754114,0.0001123564,0.00001631888,0.00003063252,0.00003755187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001936163,0.00003676177,0.9837399,0.00002692466,0.00009170739,0.0001559959,0.0002957058,0.0005380124,0.01021906,0.00005521028,0.00004129856,0.004605742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001657169,0.0000308868,0.9990715,0.000001477257,0.00001310141,0.00004200401,0.0001190004,0.0004026156,0.0002292898,0.00001345586,0.00007358194,0.000001468405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997301,0.00004687803,0.00001955923,0.000005788031,4.635199e-7,8.740387e-7,0.00005677329,0.000001551452,0.0001380743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998314,0.00003164947,0.00003679085,0.000002999844,0.000001117537,0.000001219983,0.00006412909,4.174253e-7,0.0000302683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01052416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02092582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02403089654262711,"score_gpt":0.2212651880952564,"score_spread":0.1972342915526293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}