{"id":"W1919725085","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02460.x","title":"Carbon sequestration potential of tropical pasture compared with afforestation in Panama","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute","keywords":"Environmental science; Carbon sequestration; Afforestation; Carbon sink; Ecosystem respiration; Eddy covariance; Ecosystem; Pasture; Primary production; Soil carbon; Carbon cycle; Agroforestry; Biomass (ecology); Agronomy; Ecology; Soil water; Biology; Soil science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002854147,0.00006232299,0.00008817314,0.0000155389,0.00001057839,0.000001853574,0.00006196247,0.00007991953,0.00003900242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001596223,0.00004761304,0.00001213918,0.0001096063,0.00008841548,0.00004482172,0.00002505347,0.00003954309,0.000004038331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006766348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004284645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003656849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003875864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995517,0.00004052066,0.0001062689,0.0001255415,0.00005526105,0.0001207471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998489,0.000002252074,0.00005086155,0.00006815275,0.000004608037,0.00002522998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006703489,0.00003460385,0.997585,0.000001720305,0.000003311721,0.000007424158,0.0002043876,0.00005450069,0.0003531181,0.001047717,0.00000160732,0.0006396045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002431281,0.0001674977,0.9909482,0.00000436009,0.000006795016,0.000010728,0.00002935678,0.007386283,0.00002550243,0.001099634,0.00002048602,0.00005801226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967319,0.00001106125,0.000444185,0.0000296896,0.0000504955,0.0001213628,0.00003745264,0.0000103205,0.002563558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992652,0.000007153752,0.0005930254,0.0000211647,0.00001607025,0.00001130571,0.00007980684,0.000001908179,0.000004354428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007331783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5528086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02403089654262711,"score_gpt":0.2212651880952564,"score_spread":0.1972342915526293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}