{"id":"W1919998225","doi":"10.1002/jat.2919","title":"Characterization of the human kinetic adjustment factor for the health risk assessment of environmental contaminants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Risk factor; Relevance (law); Risk assessment; Toxicokinetics; Environmental health; Econometrics; Function (biology); Toxicology; Statistics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Medicine; Mathematics; Biology; Pharmacology; Pharmacokinetics; Genetics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896181,0.001300154,0.0006257354,0.001302159,0.0004212037,0.001428617,0.001396323,0.001095019,0.001983641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01394017,0.0003719692,0.001659047,0.001099241,0.0005990889,0.001372684,0.001044959,0.001515398,0.0006051239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001136157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002132431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008322033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003694494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976571,0.0007829305,0.0001500485,0.0004714105,0.0007927105,0.0001457929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930894,0.004235306,0.000746441,0.0008069428,0.001047305,0.00007459582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001875949,0.0001042503,0.01401465,0.0006920348,0.0002614782,0.0002632488,0.0002189013,0.715815,0.01627742,0.03794777,0.003452487,0.2107652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002608038,0.0003646425,0.01457691,0.0002690093,0.0001915203,0.000989171,0.0001142775,0.8994304,0.02216401,0.03473697,0.02696937,0.0001676768],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03027162,0.002797717,0.957658,0.0003161035,0.0001026729,0.0001564533,0.0005843004,0.0006317348,0.007481392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6995282,0.003463205,0.2909551,0.0002970317,0.0001268092,0.0004952807,0.001502592,0.0003959986,0.003235822],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008322033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02589381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02468620509400238,"score_gpt":0.3766225273577764,"score_spread":0.351936322263774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}