{"id":"W1921012576","doi":"10.1108/jic-01-2015-0010","title":"Negative aspects of counter-knowledge on absorptive capacity and human capital","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Absorptive capacity; Argument (complex analysis); Knowledge management; Originality; Context (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Knowledge value chain; Explicit knowledge; Business; Computer science; Organizational learning; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00432416,0.0003822633,0.000427245,0.001229583,0.0006753422,0.003364652,0.0007569758,0.001061066,0.006389792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02641395,0.000232929,0.0003926455,0.00134001,0.004098308,0.002404607,0.002778437,0.0008933818,0.0003097946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001907823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002415795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003254952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00216406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957141,0.002224874,0.0002367823,0.0003920591,0.0009423944,0.0004899132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8672818,0.09817632,0.02256419,0.005785447,0.003471476,0.00272074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006132052,0.0006986943,0.8950067,0.000735163,0.0003668923,0.00145643,0.00763925,0.007531323,0.002064674,0.02195408,0.0009468402,0.06098678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004760858,0.0004833676,0.9306867,0.0007004041,0.000355018,0.0009678186,0.01233599,0.008468593,0.002650924,0.03826034,0.004941345,0.0001018325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790002,0.0007807818,0.001428897,0.001253096,0.00001573662,0.00002367649,0.000103337,0.00001032914,0.01738393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993606,0.0001209087,0.0001882184,0.00003837674,0.000009016434,0.000005937987,0.00001898459,0.000001070477,0.0002568109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006389792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02286857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04054356067578902,"score_gpt":0.253989486610799,"score_spread":0.21344592593501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}