{"id":"W1921406807","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2014-0507","title":"Bearing capacity factors for a conical footing using lower- and upper-bound finite elements limit analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Limit analysis; Conical surface; Limit (mathematics); Bearing capacity; Mathematics; Rotational symmetry; Range (aeronautics); Geometry; Ligand cone angle; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Structural engineering; Materials science; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007381369,0.0002973441,0.0005450133,0.0007297168,0.0002767867,0.000263702,0.0002897418,0.0003084121,0.00002798046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008999219,0.0002957636,0.0003823916,0.0007972529,0.00008584684,0.0001722108,0.00004578733,0.0008191371,0.000002800477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006197917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001878112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003482766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00193054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979445,0.0000303458,0.0006114259,0.0002881847,0.0002835849,0.0008419367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975517,0.000195263,0.00008477517,0.0002622973,0.0001474284,0.001758546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000458125,0.00001048292,0.002895177,0.00001809749,0.0005821117,0.00002428908,0.00004923706,0.9945567,0.0002845441,0.00007546775,0.00009324156,0.001406126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004081827,0.00007449558,0.001737285,0.00004478985,0.0006931917,0.00005242269,0.00009470939,0.9899344,0.00007842818,0.0003077977,0.00618491,0.0003893517],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903989,0.0003106404,0.3085158,0.0001505562,0.0002308308,0.0001301864,0.00005432194,0.0001660096,0.00004272763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941586,0.00002595584,0.00549615,0.00006167501,0.000167528,0.000006067083,0.00001247894,0.0000485914,0.00002290883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3037598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04196088596636716,"score_gpt":0.2350355283271943,"score_spread":0.1930746423608272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}