{"id":"W1921406807","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2014-0507","title":"Bearing capacity factors for a conical footing using lower- and upper-bound finite elements limit analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Limit analysis; Conical surface; Limit (mathematics); Bearing capacity; Mathematics; Rotational symmetry; Range (aeronautics); Geometry; Ligand cone angle; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Structural engineering; Materials science; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006422052,0.0005102557,0.0005338038,0.001277665,0.0003929776,0.0008014716,0.0008321084,0.0004569567,0.002949519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018496,0.0002977934,0.0007416593,0.0008159276,0.0005138411,0.0006381058,0.0003672078,0.0002705952,0.0006846622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006615259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001292933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006519225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008070137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996383,0.00004926483,0.00002089851,0.00003983592,0.0002198603,0.00003186168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995469,0.0002203362,0.00005537336,0.00003714027,0.0001281282,0.00001208268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005058762,0.00003091798,0.001520653,0.00009799971,0.000009042766,0.00005540322,0.00007208618,0.94813,0.01056219,0.007510213,0.0005372889,0.03142355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000379426,0.00001666368,0.0004490058,0.00001196588,0.000005586342,0.00002010334,0.00002141298,0.9938927,0.003954802,0.001034187,0.0005788046,0.00001097605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1616478,0.0002790995,0.8194681,0.00008078797,0.00002180112,0.00007198668,0.0002072119,0.0004514693,0.01777167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910986,0.0002097434,0.08537382,0.00001688231,0.000007419365,0.0001316444,0.0002771087,0.0001151241,0.002882302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006519225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01296258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04196088596636716,"score_gpt":0.2350355283271943,"score_spread":0.1930746423608272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}