{"id":"W1921487008","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01269.x","title":"Should biomass be considered more frequently as a currency in terrestrial arthropod community analyses?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Arthropod; Terrestrial ecosystem; Ecosystem; Relative species abundance; Biology; Community structure; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454189,0.0001429758,0.0003914102,0.0001966378,0.0002320864,0.000009462377,0.0002639933,0.0002009124,0.0007374192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001921898,0.0001267119,0.00008887067,0.0002797653,0.0005878836,0.0001045597,0.0001468131,0.0007504469,0.00006436762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002581495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005068465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002486987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02196377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985099,0.0001338178,0.0007111921,0.0001303118,0.0001799371,0.0003348442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.0005793118,0.0005051522,0.0001536223,0.0000130257,0.00009885554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009465271,0.001507418,0.9652165,0.00001303549,0.0003033146,0.0004349925,0.00563116,0.002884987,0.01538239,0.001493815,0.003438234,0.002747625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002960529,0.000517339,0.9674505,0.000007042147,0.00007100013,0.0001324568,0.003341526,0.000193784,0.0009692212,0.02308923,0.001060915,0.0002064326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847575,0.00003339718,0.0002024589,0.00120805,0.0004164246,0.000148394,0.000002080162,0.000008327072,0.01322333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979109,0.00003529561,0.001061634,0.0009016501,0.00005329816,0.000004466067,0.000004362784,0.000007306746,0.0000211169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02171507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0689176464270819,"score_gpt":0.3647959486065598,"score_spread":0.2958783021794779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}