{"id":"W1921762735","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.2004.1338925","title":"The complex envelope (CE) FDTD method and its numerical properties","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Envelope (radar); Numerical stability; Stability (learning theory); Dispersion (optics); Computation; Finite difference method; Numerical analysis; Computer simulation; Time domain; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Algorithm; Mechanics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007167899,0.0003144542,0.0004013858,0.0004941878,0.0003926239,0.000766845,0.0005897063,0.0009307678,0.002226641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003706665,0.000204267,0.0002897854,0.0007484023,0.0007581508,0.001002082,0.0004724404,0.000925481,0.0006980644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006179234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001411136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006142172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996718,0.00006725483,0.0000191453,0.00004211655,0.0001824884,0.00001718936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985554,0.0008773038,0.00007453001,0.0001241661,0.0003341787,0.00003455353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001362763,0.00006865283,0.001278111,0.0006146425,0.00003360117,0.0004032043,0.0004272065,0.2558653,0.06282683,0.2900999,0.00676239,0.381484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001785349,0.00003697756,0.0003386009,0.00004549628,0.00001114566,0.0009551758,0.00003657988,0.9180552,0.02026426,0.02304901,0.03715086,0.00003884614],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00259303,0.0006799059,0.9934129,0.0001198774,0.00004404796,0.00001831313,0.00002955633,0.0001449605,0.002957433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1754402,0.002898999,0.8122911,0.0001434794,0.0000861599,0.0001718361,0.0001799814,0.0001845805,0.008603555],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002226641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007448912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04037152284626459,"score_gpt":0.2910608179493475,"score_spread":0.2506892951030829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}