{"id":"W1921762735","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.2004.1338925","title":"The complex envelope (CE) FDTD method and its numerical properties","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Envelope (radar); Numerical stability; Stability (learning theory); Dispersion (optics); Computation; Finite difference method; Numerical analysis; Computer simulation; Time domain; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Algorithm; Mechanics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000176263,0.0001026546,0.0001207022,0.00001843092,0.0001137456,0.00004080346,0.00008310439,0.00003654592,0.0001394684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008082417,0.00006070929,0.00002432374,0.0001440835,0.0000251574,0.00004280244,0.00002333268,0.0001054623,0.00003515171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000224488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009349752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009156668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001459623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993874,0.0000592602,0.0001496085,0.0001061245,0.00009890472,0.0001986993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996336,0.0001629214,0.000009885054,0.00009566342,0.00002337813,0.00007454432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005387606,0.00005664667,0.0001151089,0.00008252361,0.0001300346,0.000005618555,0.001102821,0.08565485,0.2136744,0.05861645,0.001093943,0.6394137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283163,0.000323857,0.01445713,0.00002408776,0.00003317609,0.00006511583,0.0001266614,0.7642784,0.08247353,0.01132306,0.1249641,0.0006477805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04191075,0.003532271,0.9176301,0.002617603,0.0001854118,0.0003360701,7.649957e-7,0.0006287117,0.03315828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8877007,0.0001392242,0.1112812,0.0002510188,0.00003518146,0.00001120065,4.768449e-7,0.00001874837,0.0005622801],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8457899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2475653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04037152284626459,"score_gpt":0.2910608179493475,"score_spread":0.2506892951030829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}