{"id":"W1922672836","doi":"10.1111/rec.12130","title":"Vegetation Recovery in Slash‐Pile Scars Following Conifer Removal in a Grassland‐Restoration Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Forb; Slash (logging); Vegetation (pathology); Grassland; Species richness; Environmental science; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Restoration ecology; Disturbance (geology); Plant cover; Habitat; Forest restoration; Biology; Ecosystem; Forest ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007537774,0.0001325576,0.0002165309,0.000166747,0.0001318815,0.00001867083,0.00009500016,0.0001760909,0.0001056478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000295316,0.000145925,0.0000447617,0.000276491,0.00007914146,0.0004284965,0.00005529515,0.0001468907,0.000288206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006390465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002937286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001308411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03348013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984734,0.0003682114,0.0004080624,0.0003341709,0.0001482894,0.0002678807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993829,0.0002728868,0.0001444706,0.0001488869,0.00001193856,0.00003893442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006550233,0.0001617534,0.93563,0.000009791931,0.00001197208,0.00002119459,0.00114015,0.05596799,0.002527541,0.002299319,0.0004694969,0.001695319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024196,0.0001949001,0.9563146,0.00001431072,0.000006885294,0.000007885597,0.0001276769,0.03800891,0.0001575853,0.003264968,0.000707375,0.0001707527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910754,0.00004870488,0.00120561,0.0005441686,0.0006769822,0.0003170199,4.829864e-7,0.00002981395,0.006101837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981643,0.00002040131,0.001056029,0.000265361,0.00003450064,0.0001416884,0.00003183618,0.0000107929,0.000275088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03334929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008759708551335283,"score_gpt":0.2448751012820032,"score_spread":0.236115392730668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}