{"id":"W1923241890","doi":"10.1139/b2012-102","title":"Comment on “Acquiring DNA sequence data from dried archival red algae (Florideophyceae) for the purpose of applying available names to contemporary genetic species: a critical assessment” <sup>1</sup>Appears in Botany <b>90</b>(3): 191–203. doi:10.1139/b11-079.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herbarium; Biology; Ancient DNA; DNA sequencing; Botany; Sequence (biology); Type (biology); Algae; DNA; Evolutionary biology; Genealogy; Genetics; Ecology; History; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009807234,0.0003406673,0.0005390776,0.0001118675,0.0002427786,0.0001110808,0.001084406,0.000102391,0.002026669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000317814,0.0002634233,0.0000960865,0.0002578041,0.0002388695,0.0003548671,0.0003318619,0.0003082041,0.0001953978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002358262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001604148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006772166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009822672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970587,0.0002546291,0.0007003651,0.0006879919,0.0004507525,0.0008475973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961503,0.002366696,0.0001436194,0.0009965205,0.00004537541,0.0002974971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004830726,0.0008458861,0.6804875,0.0003185425,0.0004961811,0.0002664849,0.0016592,0.001469837,0.0255104,0.002193463,0.18549,0.09643181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001684362,0.0009338318,0.2527988,0.0003014296,0.00009418403,0.00003107027,0.001587544,0.06790962,0.0005353598,0.000960808,0.6723031,0.0008599016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.930446,0.002713339,0.003125675,0.007641326,0.001022871,0.003850019,0.006832694,0.0001237401,0.04424439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911037,0.0001254084,0.00503169,0.001946839,0.0004381568,0.0000593256,0.0004336207,0.0000164992,0.0008447346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4868131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08693406845532337,"score_gpt":0.2891311958406513,"score_spread":0.2021971273853279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}