{"id":"W1924666097","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012027","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Brazil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005636052,0.0000673187,0.0001646082,0.00003655202,0.0002434616,0.00003916034,0.00007492789,0.00004739506,0.00008221319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001699525,0.00006404213,0.00002659718,0.0003886564,0.0002414602,0.0004185898,0.00001328913,0.000121022,0.00000157324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005187016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001313201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000349424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001530148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.0001562914,0.0002547204,0.00007265739,0.0002175495,0.0002104201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995883,0.0000376458,0.000132391,0.00003519217,0.00003384384,0.0001726608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001353465,0.0003269109,0.5983022,0.0004934639,0.00005156001,0.00003212276,0.009693949,7.488166e-7,0.0001812633,0.3460072,0.00271013,0.04218691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005162403,0.00004735174,0.9271331,0.001506094,0.0000677143,0.0002338623,0.00221215,0.000002298533,0.00008864101,0.0008968332,0.06710743,0.0001882351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8582511,0.04933485,0.00009997855,0.05761758,0.0006292412,0.0004069927,0.0000374656,0.00003348299,0.03358933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865906,0.01252105,0.000180988,0.0004861925,0.0002044333,8.137931e-7,7.820196e-7,0.00000310482,0.0000120159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3451104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03231256595847817,"score_gpt":0.3668339060110848,"score_spread":0.3345213400526067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}