{"id":"W1925069669","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2003.1226169","title":"Quantification of the truncation errors in finite-difference time-domain methods","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation error; Finite-difference time-domain method; Truncation (statistics); Finite difference method; Mathematics; Taylor series; Dispersion (optics); Algorithm; Finite difference; Propagation of uncertainty; Approximation error; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003493362,0.000067578,0.0001056215,0.00006168002,0.00001599153,0.000004760946,0.0001119,0.00004887126,0.00009662974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001949013,0.0000494148,0.00003367332,0.0004759337,0.00002788065,0.00002750983,0.00000861878,0.00008554783,0.000011812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004298087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002675935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001017926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999364,0.000141161,0.0002239287,0.00008698349,0.00008515026,0.00009883491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994639,0.0002717563,0.00003119704,0.0001932853,0.00001987479,0.00002001912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006254868,0.00003862998,0.000591702,0.0000185012,0.000005469431,7.36602e-8,0.0003896729,0.2409028,0.7034717,0.007772053,0.00001004893,0.04679312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006007297,0.00006252707,0.1634068,0.00003324228,0.000008642971,0.000001057868,0.00005955729,0.3605498,0.4341655,0.04064533,0.0002873668,0.000179424],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3490835,0.00005010191,0.6474189,0.0002230392,0.00008193176,0.0001227332,4.681489e-7,0.00006220641,0.002957113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7676769,0.000004976281,0.2321058,0.00002809756,0.000005538487,0.000008066771,0.000001466873,0.000007756487,0.0001613489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4185934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2015077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02444501816002384,"score_gpt":0.3146889705093236,"score_spread":0.2902439523492998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}