{"id":"W1925069669","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2003.1226169","title":"Quantification of the truncation errors in finite-difference time-domain methods","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation error; Finite-difference time-domain method; Truncation (statistics); Finite difference method; Mathematics; Taylor series; Dispersion (optics); Algorithm; Finite difference; Propagation of uncertainty; Approximation error; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004518593,0.000578525,0.0005726336,0.0009732906,0.0005750363,0.0008930626,0.0009067247,0.0008936985,0.0009748334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01625974,0.0002068983,0.0003021939,0.0006938154,0.001065724,0.001594269,0.001190533,0.0009842053,0.0002629854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007740706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009770134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001371139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001047074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971528,0.0005693464,0.0002452816,0.0001634802,0.001769331,0.00009972525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899017,0.006010923,0.0007868393,0.001169947,0.002000073,0.000130528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000429734,0.0001218271,0.004403736,0.0005702098,0.00006991898,0.0003361985,0.0007231307,0.6503806,0.06324314,0.1056554,0.001897797,0.1721684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001559923,0.00005453682,0.0006747323,0.00006344604,0.00001281087,0.0001843771,0.00005491609,0.9321076,0.04450041,0.01859336,0.003698378,0.00003982316],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02003793,0.0003401693,0.9772047,0.00007725629,0.00006301886,0.00004219543,0.00005208667,0.0003061514,0.001876396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3381584,0.0005421314,0.6580117,0.0000796839,0.00003839576,0.000134011,0.0002400099,0.0002341417,0.002561524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004518593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02389693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02444501816002384,"score_gpt":0.3146889705093236,"score_spread":0.2902439523492998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}