{"id":"W1925289750","doi":"10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01063.x","title":"Ties That Bind? Assessing the Impact of Economic Interdependence on East Asian Alliances*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Focus","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; East Asia; Argument (complex analysis); Economic interdependence; Group cohesiveness; Empirical evidence; Quarter (Canadian coin); International trade; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Political science; Development economics; International economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography; China","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004442292,0.0002212263,0.0002979289,0.001144919,0.001375247,0.002252494,0.0004113647,0.0007081547,0.005197074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0193716,0.0001473254,0.000322661,0.001589954,0.001904627,0.002823998,0.003682536,0.0009899348,0.0002918285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006936937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005578274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002731107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004652133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979677,0.001254819,0.00009795521,0.0001174193,0.00025425,0.0003079751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758305,0.01154707,0.00733026,0.001114707,0.001457506,0.002719981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002604749,0.000204699,0.9452556,0.00007380186,0.0003240371,0.0003682303,0.006984699,0.002994595,0.0009080785,0.01290916,0.0003798498,0.02933671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001586109,0.0002386772,0.9654971,0.00008142948,0.0001966159,0.000135665,0.01974212,0.002339537,0.0003750429,0.008586395,0.002773092,0.00001832858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891464,0.0002815559,0.0002454074,0.0002949906,0.000005366303,0.000005123512,0.00002030672,0.00000147723,0.009999502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996799,0.00009760203,0.00003855646,0.00001944328,0.000003720844,0.000003005998,0.00001024628,5.684786e-7,0.0001468788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005197074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02349335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08346437542675743,"score_gpt":0.3719922540403504,"score_spread":0.288527878613593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}