{"id":"W1926460403","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31553","title":"IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE MIND: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO WOMEN AND MENTAL HEALTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mental health; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079588,0.0000711348,0.0002901723,0.00001608328,0.0002140034,0.00001524821,0.000443871,0.00003117723,0.0001195806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003715378,0.00003541612,0.00006761448,0.0004267253,0.001976712,0.0001169786,0.00006979478,0.00006991566,1.194747e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004430716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7085708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8170732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982571,0.0005200526,0.0003243353,0.0001709621,0.0004759157,0.0002516378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993013,0.0001672066,0.00006805886,0.000306012,0.00005951601,0.00009789387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013328,0.0007474569,0.793794,0.0001625873,0.00003733845,4.667215e-8,0.1764968,0.000004627877,0.00002204194,0.02816131,0.0004805579,0.00007316757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004699439,0.0000350026,0.7915693,0.00002045801,0.00003940159,1.333414e-7,0.2061085,0.00001360636,0.00006908165,0.001855435,0.0001903263,0.00005176306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748964,0.00004479153,0.000005026626,0.01778018,0.00007278307,0.0003433536,0.0001386669,0.000001040612,0.006717724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994466,0.000001196493,0.00001522892,0.0004575592,0.00002403713,0.00001584422,7.851115e-7,0.000002779356,0.00003596546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03688513608631631,"score_gpt":0.3346762824749945,"score_spread":0.2977911463886782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}