{"id":"W1927094806","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2012-0511","title":"Comparative analysis of the spatial distribution of fishing effort contrasting ecological isodars and discrete choice models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Bedford Institute of Oceanography; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Groundfish; Mixed logit; Otter; Fishing; Fishery; Sample (material); Discrete choice; Econometrics; Ideal free distribution; Fisheries management; Habitat; Ecology; Statistics; Computer science; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134779,0.0005043477,0.0006163853,0.001908724,0.0002011549,0.001251156,0.001004156,0.0005354954,0.000981695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02807649,0.0003119941,0.00101832,0.00106285,0.0007379622,0.001338179,0.0008087507,0.0005603029,0.0001427857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006986727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01690294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00900525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978593,0.001414993,0.00009748841,0.0003027171,0.0001826902,0.0001427034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660003,0.02957297,0.00150556,0.001305318,0.00119242,0.000423529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005902118,0.0001195354,0.09737736,0.00006347601,0.0002129121,0.0001457941,0.0002619916,0.8733999,0.0004850696,0.01041176,0.0003202802,0.01661166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001197725,0.00006291647,0.01129518,0.000007054065,0.00001678767,0.00002383341,0.00005657902,0.9858613,0.0000792309,0.002490845,0.00008216026,0.00001207662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551157,0.0001386666,0.04333357,0.0001386074,0.000008737788,0.00004002636,0.0001856667,0.00009142939,0.000947525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994392,0.0000658686,0.004919299,0.00001556828,0.00000499108,0.00001825212,0.0002628703,0.00001131568,0.0003099715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01690294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07127875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02914401311121241,"score_gpt":0.2499342020864216,"score_spread":0.2207901889752092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}