{"id":"W1927459645","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v117i4.823","title":"An Aerial Survey Technique for the Forest-Dwelling Ecotype of Woodland Caribou, <em>Rangifer tarandus caribou</em>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Aerial survey; Geography; Vital rates; Population; Confidence interval; Transect; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Statistics; Cartography; Mathematics; Population growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001472051,0.000290795,0.0003484227,0.00004420857,0.0007660474,0.0001132567,0.0008857422,0.0002420319,0.001870463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005084898,0.0001917456,0.0001519471,0.0003458921,0.0002208108,0.0001351975,0.0001080307,0.0003624618,0.00003797956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003211117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001307167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6783867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997988,0.0002637703,0.0003475075,0.0004169786,0.0003251647,0.0006585219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982107,0.0005456944,0.0001411127,0.0007750867,0.00006896244,0.0002584901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001660595,0.000282965,0.3549639,0.000396788,0.0009392342,0.0001312968,0.007406157,0.006155762,0.005267489,0.03297966,0.5616434,0.02817274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311563,0.0004556409,0.3522546,0.00005939626,0.0002678421,0.00004687886,0.0002716452,0.00106856,0.003085429,0.002169932,0.637886,0.001122445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423262,0.00305891,0.0008688263,0.005048947,0.002766933,0.005966933,0.001509431,0.0001009743,0.03835279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969448,0.0001089202,0.000289796,0.001575589,0.0001655349,0.0001152139,0.00008067245,0.00003390004,0.0006855947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3153211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02059673773099301,"score_gpt":0.238414034758071,"score_spread":0.217817297027078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}