{"id":"W1927459645","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v117i4.823","title":"An Aerial Survey Technique for the Forest-Dwelling Ecotype of Woodland Caribou, <em>Rangifer tarandus caribou</em>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Aerial survey; Geography; Vital rates; Population; Confidence interval; Transect; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Statistics; Cartography; Mathematics; Population growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065548,0.000445425,0.000268306,0.001781219,0.000314023,0.0002238908,0.0002986863,0.0002539423,0.002989962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002476516,0.0002057067,0.0003637747,0.001361038,0.0002219829,0.0002822937,0.0003299089,0.0002030977,0.0009280024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001969843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000216242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007255918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02302122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.0002877135,0.00005021023,0.0001360729,0.0001448284,0.00002832547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978933,0.0009166745,0.000409439,0.0002804619,0.0004626628,0.0000374757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004239758,0.0002607502,0.4698379,0.0006694493,0.0003107546,0.000549952,0.002976951,0.003251946,0.1478633,0.001132126,0.006086018,0.3666368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005180415,0.0009264079,0.9524428,0.00007140081,0.0002214212,0.001677501,0.001055285,0.01324332,0.02090635,0.0003841782,0.008956044,0.00006358277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.800365,0.0006253993,0.1820038,0.0001379153,0.0001070198,0.001350485,0.003337316,0.0005893245,0.01148375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7719797,0.0005700383,0.2212298,0.00008770997,0.00003813268,0.0007565026,0.001307049,0.00003698122,0.003993945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02059673773099301,"score_gpt":0.238414034758071,"score_spread":0.217817297027078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}