{"id":"W1928123202","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2007.9669186","title":"The Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Approach: A Critical Review","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Construct (python library); Consistency (knowledge bases); Presentation (obstetrics); Strengths and weaknesses; Sustainable development; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00782524,0.00193052,0.003895154,0.0003376835,0.00478405,0.0005169176,0.003079294,0.000657369,0.0005094346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003583203,0.0008316195,0.001162327,0.002517827,0.001032665,0.0004163799,0.000579907,0.00175651,0.000137161],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01346351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008478078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003790124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2634545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876807,0.0007444236,0.004914711,0.001055266,0.000810611,0.004794282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864654,0.001701347,0.00225509,0.0003890401,0.004749053,0.004440054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004085896,0.00026031,0.001329856,0.03490129,0.004658972,0.003729036,0.007053511,0.000006711064,5.207389e-7,0.1053206,0.1314257,0.7112727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000328946,0.0003984904,0.00414759,0.03867041,0.00111241,0.001930339,0.01905144,0.000001006119,0.000002727962,0.0009108849,0.9318284,0.001617322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003030392,0.9661437,0.00002596319,0.02285172,0.004226309,0.002535956,0.00005074382,0.000025098,0.001110158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002419941,0.9827135,0.002382866,0.002328397,0.001943703,0.0003312812,0.0002043433,0.00004003414,0.007635973],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09688679149626109,"score_gpt":0.2835317645547872,"score_spread":0.1866449730585261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}