{"id":"W1928217968","doi":"10.1111/ele.12522","title":"The effects of phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: deconstructing Darwin's naturalisation conundrum","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Naturalisation; Introduced species; Invasive species; Biology; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Niche; Adaptation (eye); Evolutionary biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003743025,0.0002545408,0.00032567,0.00007207275,0.0004155585,0.00002173395,0.0002605779,0.000543571,0.0000526344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004007471,0.0001814662,0.00006977821,0.0001107699,0.001216973,0.00008657988,0.0002050422,0.0009613296,0.00004482249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002796132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000220417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005531493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003536137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.0003886461,0.0002960275,0.0003824459,0.0001890566,0.0003658833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971194,0.002174341,0.0004071021,0.000240297,0.0000211407,0.00003774244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003282457,0.00001729497,0.5544118,0.00009428363,0.0002391777,0.0001096776,0.00047312,0.0005151978,0.001266588,0.00002004158,0.4416932,0.001126788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134974,0.0005155705,0.9903418,0.00008343252,0.0002247956,0.00009184992,0.00006912459,0.0003868435,0.0002789527,0.001052958,0.005323436,0.0004963098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8323305,0.0001127477,0.000003582707,0.1654673,0.001319556,0.0003604823,0.000005231002,0.00001618847,0.000384506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8638095,0.00009653268,0.0000569684,0.1355685,0.000160871,0.00003895296,0.00004687099,0.00002419431,0.0001975145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4363697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7399977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006502955799124966,"score_gpt":0.2266089950838556,"score_spread":0.2201060392847306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}