{"id":"W1928954169","doi":"10.1109/iros.1997.649002","title":"Optimal upper bound conditioning for manipulator kinematic design optimization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jacobian matrix and determinant; Kinematics; Control theory (sociology); Manipulator (device); Simple (philosophy); Upper and lower bounds; Condition number; Optimal design; Planar; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Robotic arm; Artificial intelligence; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003460596,0.001610994,0.001447389,0.001162389,0.0005605681,0.001626836,0.001043588,0.0009703319,0.007129903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01050243,0.0004644416,0.0005464085,0.001062452,0.00200091,0.002166825,0.001933546,0.00196296,0.001442768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001398762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001451959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007207968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009478069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997632,0.0006836842,0.0001159768,0.0003192848,0.001079113,0.0001698405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965988,0.00164332,0.0003470558,0.000570727,0.0006924914,0.0001476675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002560575,0.0002442862,0.0004515821,0.0002431748,0.00004558951,0.00005691548,0.00008880517,0.5940168,0.01299982,0.2381754,0.005804008,0.1476175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128074,0.0001057427,0.000132527,0.00001967018,0.000006484151,0.00001393615,0.000005339601,0.9476575,0.004364916,0.04612449,0.001539714,0.00001683613],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003521064,0.0001491242,0.9918874,0.00005352233,0.00003498821,0.00002815505,0.00002754166,0.0001707678,0.004127399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4469839,0.0006435753,0.5398449,0.0002968356,0.0003119521,0.0005515859,0.0004255433,0.0004923881,0.01044947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007129903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02385193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02870306570628079,"score_gpt":0.212257167618277,"score_spread":0.1835541019119962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}