{"id":"W1929543399","doi":"10.1109/pes.2005.1489352","title":"Intelligent SVC control for transient stability enhancement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Static VAR compensator; Fuzzy logic; Controller (irrigation); Transient (computer programming); Electric power system; Adaptive control; Computer science; Fuzzy control system; Control engineering; Power (physics); Engineering; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001354589,0.0002459339,0.0002554656,0.0002437919,0.0002073022,0.0004306971,0.000287529,0.0002017744,0.001206269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002916096,0.00008355267,0.0001432461,0.0002022355,0.0002007684,0.0001958567,0.0001781775,0.0002970146,0.0001831618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002434363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002034049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001269883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001680295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998893,0.00001628977,0.000006107103,0.00001663103,0.00005927831,0.0000125357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999163,0.00002120076,0.00001232446,0.000008908849,0.00003675782,0.000004635592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003720794,0.0001514988,0.0007645183,0.0002316193,0.00006320794,0.0002070336,0.0001565807,0.3676464,0.202983,0.02913505,0.004795711,0.3934933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000235895,0.0001044319,0.0004897068,0.000008097177,0.00002009132,0.0000569641,0.000009334239,0.9771203,0.0155859,0.00258797,0.003985625,0.0000080877],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08922675,0.000830052,0.8886237,0.0001878262,0.0001465349,0.00004616273,0.00004109076,0.001677232,0.01922065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816455,0.0001594328,0.01541907,0.00003334291,0.000027399,0.00002036525,0.00003149669,0.00002179308,0.002641598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001269883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004035413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009730472462300773,"score_gpt":0.2178981345653898,"score_spread":0.208167662103089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}