{"id":"W1931747851","doi":"10.1109/ursi-at-rasc.2015.7302945","title":"On the achievable resolution from microwave tomography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Georgian College; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Microwave; Microwave imaging; Image resolution; Ranging; Inverse scattering problem; Wavelength; Inverse problem; Resolution (logic); Optics; Computer science; Iterative reconstruction; Tomography; Electromagnetic radiation; Physics; Scattering; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004043687,0.001199002,0.001238015,0.001149257,0.0007978217,0.002929096,0.001903729,0.003082137,0.004156074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01657436,0.001105081,0.0004474059,0.001237269,0.002854508,0.005586613,0.003139773,0.0041758,0.002643318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001127894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004177845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005408644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003604048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961893,0.00117766,0.0001385226,0.0005892085,0.001634734,0.0002705646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896272,0.008608888,0.0002986332,0.0004303465,0.0008701135,0.0001647728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006104719,0.0001038206,0.001274238,0.002918251,0.00008820014,0.001149143,0.0006446263,0.03412017,0.1018794,0.7397029,0.0106965,0.1068124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008025882,0.0002473402,0.001570673,0.001619463,0.0001044784,0.002921121,0.0004291075,0.2057906,0.1694493,0.5380272,0.07955126,0.0002092831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03614524,0.09658214,0.6748509,0.008253436,0.0006912709,0.00009886561,0.0005993115,0.0007751567,0.1820037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6792035,0.07327482,0.2300153,0.002562975,0.002024043,0.0003547382,0.0008333246,0.0004842805,0.01124698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004156074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02138531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01743209459983548,"score_gpt":0.1929922555323717,"score_spread":0.1755601609325362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}